Skip to content

ISMS6 Risk_Assessment_Tool-v0.1

Sheet: Guidance

Implementation Guidance This document should be used to perform a risk assessment, including assessing the expected effects of treatments.
Design This spreadsheet has been designed using CertiKit's colour scheme. To choose a different table colour scheme, click in the table, select the Table Design menu tab and choose a different style. The same applies to the drop-down menu "slicers" at the top of the screen. Click in one slicer, then hold down the Shift key and click on the rest, one by one. This will select them all. Then click on the Slicer menu tab and choose a different style. You can also create your own table and slicer styles using your own colour scheme to reflect your organization's branding.
Purpose of this document This document should be used to perform a scenario-based risk assessment, including assessing the expected effects of treatments.
Areas of the standard addressed The following areas of the ISO/IEC 27001 standard are addressed: 6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities 6.1.2 Information security risk assessment 6.1.3 Information security risk treatment
General guidance The key objective of the risk assessment is to ensure that all of the serious risks that need treatment are identified so that something can be done about them. Be careful not to make your risk assessment too large or complicated as much of the impact will be lost and it will be difficult to repeat at a later date. This tool is intended to be used to assess the effects of the proposed treatments also, so that the level of residual risk can be shown. If you need to select more than one control for a specific risk simply list all of the controls in the same cell by copying and pasting them from the Reference Controls tab. A summary of the type of risk that each Annex A control is intended to address is included to aid understanding and help in identifying risks. This may also be useful when completing your Statement of Applicability.
Review frequency It is a good idea to revisit this risk assessment on a regular basis and to ensure that new risks that occur are identified and assessed.
Toolkit version number ISO/IEC 27001 Toolkit Version 12
Copyright notice Except for any specifically identified third-party works included, this document has been authored by CertiKit, and is ©CertiKit except as stated below. CertiKit is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 6432088.
Licence terms This document is licensed on and subject to the standard licence terms of CertiKit, available on request, or by download from our website. All other rights are reserved. Unless you have purchased this product you only have an evaluation licence. If this product was purchased, a full licence is granted to the person identified as the licensee in the relevant purchase order. The standard licence terms include special terms relating to any third party copyright included in this document.
Disclaimer Please Note: Your use of and reliance on this document template is at your sole risk. Document templates are intended to be used as a starting point only from which you will create your own document and to which you will apply all reasonable quality checks before use. Therefore please note that it is your responsibility to ensure that the content of any document you create that is based on our templates is correct and appropriate for your needs and complies with relevant laws in your country. You should take all reasonable and proper legal and other professional advice before using this document. CertiKit makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of our document templates, assumes no duty of care to any person with respect its document templates or their contents, and expressly excludes and disclaims liability for any cost, expense, loss or damage suffered or incurred in reliance on our document templates, or in expectation of our document templates meeting your needs, including (without limitation) as a result of misstatements, errors and omissions in their contents.

Sheet: Assessment Details

Assessment Details
Security Classification [Insert classification]
Risk Assessment Title [Short, descriptive title]
Risk Assessment Scope [Describe the scope of the risk assessment - for example, location, process, assets]
Context of Risk Assessment [Describe the general environment in which the analysis is carried out and internal and external factors affecting it]
Risk Acceptance Criteria [Set out the factors which will make a risk acceptable and therefore not require treatment]
Version [Start at Version 1]
Dated [Date the assessment was carried out]
Risk Assessors [Name and title of person(s) carrying out the risk assessment]
Risk Assessment Participants [Names and titles of people contributing to the risk assessment]
Approval [Name and title of approver]
Date Approved [Date the assessment was approved]

Sheet: Risk Assessment

Scenario-Based Risk Assessment and Treatment Tool
Start with the risks that are felt to have the highest likelihood and impact combination first.
To refresh chart data on the risk dashboard, click on “Refresh All” on the Data ribbon.
RISK DESCRIPTION PRE-TREATMENT ASSESSMENT TREATMENT PLAN POST-TREATMENT ASSESSMENT
Ref Risk Summary Risk Description Risk Type Risk Owner Existing Controls Likelihood Likelihood Rationale Impact Impact Rationale Risk Score Risk Level Treatment Option Chosen Proposed Treatment Action Annex A/Control Reference Treatment Cost Treatment Action Owner Treatment Action Timescale Treatment Action Progress Treatment Action Status Post-Treatment Likelihood Post-Treatment Likelihood Rationale Post- Treatment Impact Post-Treatment Impact Rationale Post-Treatment Risk Score Post-Treatment Risk Level Comments
1.0 CI Melvin SOC2 implemented 1.0 3.0 3 LOW Accept 0.0 In Progress 1.0 1.0 1 LOW
2.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
3.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
4.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
5.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
6.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
7.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
8.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
9.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
10.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
11.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
12.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
13.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
14.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
15.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
16.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
17.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
18.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
19.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated
20.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated Select… 0.0 Select… Select… Select… Calculated Calculated

Sheet: Dashboard

ISO/IEC 27001 Scenario-based risk assessment and treatment tool dashboard
To refresh chart data on the risk dashboard, click on “Refresh All” on the Data ribbon.
Pre-treatment assessment
Post-treatment assessment
Classification of risk level Risk profile diagram
The chart below shows the rating scheme used to determine risk level based on a combination of likelihood and impact. The charts below show the spread of risk severities before and after risk treatment.
LIKELIHOOD: What are the chances of the risk event happening?
IMPACT: How major could the consequences be if the risk event happened? Pre-treatment Post-treatment
INSIGNIFICANT 1 MINOR 2 SIGNIFICANT 3 MAJOR 4 SEVERE 5 Risk Likelihood 5.0 0 0 0 0 0 Risk Likelihood 5.0 0 0 0 0 0
ALMOST CERTAIN 5 MEDIUM 5 MEDIUM 10 HIGH 15 HIGH 20 HIGH 25 4.0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 0 0 0 0
LIKELY 4 LOW 4 MEDIUM 8 HIGH 12 HIGH 16 HIGH 20 3.0 0 0 0 0 0 3.0 0 0 0 0 0
MODERATE 3 LOW 3 MEDIUM 6 MEDIUM 9 HIGH 12 HIGH 15 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 0 0 0 0 0
UNLIKELY 2 LOW 2 LOW 4 MEDIUM 6 MEDIUM 8 MEDIUM 10 1.0 0 0 1 0 0 1.0 1 0 0 0 0
RARE 1 LOW 1 LOW 2 LOW 3 LOW 4 MEDIUM 5 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Risk impact Risk impact
Treatment plan

Sheet: Pre-treatment risks

Number of Pre-treatment risks by risk level
Risk level Pre-treatment
Low 1
Medium 0
High 0
Risk level Pre-treatment
Low 0.0
Medium 0.0
High 0.0

Sheet: Pre-treat risk levels by owner

Pre-treatment risk levels by risk owner
Risk Level Risk Owner Risk Level
Calculated (blank) 20.0

Sheet: Post-treatment risks

Number of Post-mitigation risks by risk level
Risk level Post-treatment
Low 1
Medium 0
High 0
Risk level Post-treatment
Low 0.0
Medium 0.0
High 0.0

Sheet: Risks by risk level pre & post

Number of risks by risk level pre and post treatment
Risk level Pre-treatment Post-treatment
Low 1 1
Medium 0 0
High 0 0
Risk level Pre-treatment Post-treatment
Low 0.0 0.0
Medium 0.0 0.0
High 0.0 0.0

Sheet: Treatment option chosen

Risks by treatment option chosen
Treatment Option Chosen Count of Risk Summary
Select…

Sheet: Treatment cost

Total treatment cost by risk level
Risk Level Sum of Treatment Cost
Calculated 0.0

Sheet: Treatment action owner

Treatment action owner
Count of Treatment Action Owner Risk Level
Treatment Action Owner Calculated
(blank)

Sheet: Reference Controls

ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A Reference Controls
The following list of reference controls is used within the risk assessment worksheets.
REF
A.5 Organizational controls
A.5.1 Policies for information security
A.5.2 Information security roles and responsibilities
A.5.3 Segregation of duties
A.5.4 Management responsibilities
A.5.5 Contact with authorities
A.5.6 Contact with special interest groups
A.5.7 Threat intelligence
A.5.8 Information security in project management
A.5.9 Inventory of information and other associated assets
A.5.10 Acceptable use of information and other associated assets
A.5.11 Return of assets
A.5.12 Classification of information
A.5.13 Labelling of information
A.5.14 Information transfer
A.5.15 Access control
A.5.16 Identity management
A.5.17 Authentication information
A.5.18 Access rights
A.5.19 Information security in supplier relationships
A.5.20 Addressing information security within supplier agreements
A.5.21 Managing information security in the ICT supply chain
A.5.22 Monitoring, review and change management of supplier services
A.5.23 Information security for use of cloud services
A.5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation
A.5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events
A.5.26 Response to information security incidents
A.5.27 Learning from information security incidents
A.5.28 Collection of evidence
A.5.29 Information security during disruption
A.5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
A.5.31 Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements
A.5.32 Intellectual property rights
A.5.33 Protection of records
A.5.34 Privacy and protection of PII
A.5.35 Independent review of information security
A.5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security
A.5.37 Documented operating procedures
A.6 People controls
A.6.1 Screening
A.6.2 Terms and conditions of employment
A.6.3 Information security awareness, education and training
A.6.4 Disciplinary process
A.6.5 Responsibilities after termination or change of employment
A.6.6 Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements
A.6.7 Remote working
A.6.8 Information security event reporting
A.7 Physical controls
A.7.1 Physical security perimeters
A.7.2 Physical entry
A.7.3 Securing offices, rooms and facilities
A.7.4 Physical security monitoring
A.7.5 Protecting against physical and environmental threats
A.7.6 Working in secure areas
A.7.7 Clear desk and clear screen
A.7.8 Equipment siting and protection
A.7.9 Security of assets off-premises
A.7.10 Storage media
A.7.11 Supporting utilities
A.7.12 Cabling security
A.7.13 Equipment maintenance
A.7.14 Secure disposal or re-use of equipment
A.8 Technological controls
A.8.1 User endpoint devices
A.8.2 Privileged access rights
A.8.3 Information access restriction
A.8.4 Access to source code
A.8.5 Secure authentication
A.8.6 Capacity management
A.8.7 Protection against malware
A.8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities
A.8.9 Configuration management
A.8.10 Information deletion
A.8.11 Data masking
A.8.12 Data leakage prevention
A.8.13 Information backup
A.8.14 Redundancy of information processing facilities
A.8.15 Logging
A.8.16 Monitoring activities
A.8.17 Clock synchronization
A.8.18 Use of privileged utility programs
A.8.19 Installation of software on operational systems
A.8.20 Networks security
A.8.21 Security of network services
A.8.22 Segregation of networks
A.8.23 Web filtering
A.8.24 Use of cryptography
A.8.25 Secure development life cycle
A.8.26 Application security requirements
A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles
A.8.28 Secure coding
A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance
A.8.30 Outsourced development
A.8.31 Separation of development, test and production environments
A.8.32 Change management
A.8.33 Test information
A.8.34 Protection of information systems during audit testing

Sheet: Example Risks and Controls

ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A Example Risks and Reference Controls
The following list shows each of the reference controls and gives examples of the types of risks that they may be used to treat.
You may use this table to help to identify relevant risks for your organization and to define where the controls from Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 are applicable.
REF EXAMPLE RISK(S) ANNEX A CONTROL
1.0 It is not clear what the organization's rules are for managing information security. Employees and others aren't aware of what they should be doing to protect the organization A.5.1 Policies for information security
2.0 New threats have emerged that need to be addressed in policies A.5.1 Policies for information security
3.0 It is not clear who should be doing what with respect to information security A.5.2 Information security roles and responsibilities
4.0 An individual is able to perform all of the steps required to perform a sensitive business process. Checks are insufficient to prevent accidental amendment or destruction of data A.5.3 Segregation of duties
5.0 The organization is unaware of their legal or regulatory responsibilities and may break the law without realising it A.5.5 Contact with authorities
6.0 The organization lacks up to date knowledge of information security issues such as current threats, new controls and other relevant information A.5.6 Contact with special interest groups
7.0 Information gathered and created during projects is not adequately protected A.5.8 Information security in project management
8.0 Data held on mobile devices is prone to loss or theft of the device, or unauthorised access A.8.1 User endpoint devices
9.0 A teleworking site does not meet the information security standards ensured at main locations and data is exposed to loss or theft A.6.7 Remote working
10.0 It is not clear who does what with respect to cloud security and one party (e.g. cloud service customer) is under the impression that the other (e.g. cloud service provider) is monitoring a particular aspect A.5.23 Information security for use of cloud services
11.0 An employee is recruited who could deliberately breach information security A.6.1 Screening
12.0 It is not clear to employees what their responsibilities for information security are A.6.2 Terms and conditions of employment
13.0 Employees do not follow security policies as they are regarded as irrelevant A.5.4 Management responsibilities
14.0 Employees and contractors are not aware of information security policies and are unable to spot potential breaches A.6.3 Information security awareness, education and training
15.0 The consequences of committing an information security breach are not sufficiently clear to employees A.6.4 Disciplinary process
16.0 Ex-employees could breach information security after leaving e.g. making confidential information public A.6.5 Responsibilities after termination or change of employment
17.0 It is not clear what assets we are trying to protect and where they are located A.5.9 Inventory of information and other associated assets
18.0 No-one takes responsibility for protecting specific assets A.5.9 Inventory of information and other associated assets
19.0 Information and assets are used in ways that are not acceptable to the organization e.g. devices are physically abused and information left exposed A.5.10 Acceptable use of information and other associated assets
20.0 Assets are not returned when someone leaves the organization A.5.11 Return of assets
21.0 Assets that are stored with a cloud service provider are not returned A.5.23 Information security for use of cloud services
22.0 It is not clear how specific items of information should be protected A.5.12 Classification of information
23.0 Employees are unable to tell how information should be protected A.5.13 Labelling of information
24.0 Assets are handled inappropriately due to a lack of definition of how they should be addressed A.5.10 Acceptable use of information and other associated assets
25.0 Removable media is used without effective protection of the data held on it A.7.10 Storage media
26.0 The information stored on media is vulnerable to compromise when it is disposed of A.7.10 Storage media
27.0 Data held on media is not adequately protected whilst in transit e.g. by the use of encryption A.7.10 Storage media
28.0 Employees or third parties have access to information without authorisation or by mistake A.5.15 Access control
29.0 A user could gain unauthorised access to information via a network that they have no reason to legitimately use A.5.15 Access control
30.0 User accounts are created without authority or not removed when no longer needed A.5.16 Identity management
31.0 Users are given an inappropriate level of access within systems A.5.18 Access rights
32.0 Privileged access rights could be used by an unauthorised person to breach information security A.8.2 Privileged access rights
33.0 User passwords are known to someone other than the user to whom they relate A.5.17 Authentication information
34.0 Inappropriate levels of access remain in place long term and attempts to increase permissions are not spotted A.5.18 Access rights
35.0 Ex-users still have access even when they have left the organization A.5.18 Access rights
36.0 Users share user accounts and let others know their passwords A.5.17 Authentication information
37.0 Too much access is allowed to a user where their role does not require it A.8.3 Information access restriction
38.0 Logon to secure systems is possible by unauthorised users A.8.5 Secure authentication
39.0 Users do not set appropriately-strong passwords A.5.17 Authentication information
40.0 A privileged utility program could be used to bypass security controls and gain unauthorised access to information A.8.18 Use of privileged utility programs
41.0 Program source code could be destroyed or tampered with to benefit an attacker A.8.4 Access to source code
42.0 The use of encryption within the organization is haphazard and uncoordinated, resulting in a lack of effectiveness and possible illegal use A.8.24 Use of cryptography
43.0 Cryptographic keys are often lost or compromised, potentially resulting in the loss of encrypted data A.8.24 Use of cryptography
44.0 It is not clear where physical security has been, or needs to be, applied A.7.1 Physical security perimeters
45.0 Unauthorised people are able to bypass entry controls A.11.1.2 Physical entry controls
46.0 Unauthorised people are able to gain physical access to sensitive information A.7.2 Physical entry
47.0 An accident, attack or natural disaster could destroy or severely affect sensitive information and its processing A.7.5 Protecting against physical and environmental threats
48.0 People in secure areas leave the area open to attack or unauthorised access A.7.6 Working in secure areas
49.0 Access could be gained to secure areas via a publicly-accessible delivery area A.7.2 Physical entry
50.0 Screens showing sensitive information can be seen by unauthorised people A.7.8 Equipment siting and protection
51.0 Essential facilities are disabled due to a power outage A.7.11 Supporting utilities
52.0 Someone could listen in to sensitive information by tapping a cable A.7.12 Cabling security
53.0 Equipment often breaks down or fails to protect information due to a lack of appropriate care A.7.13 Equipment maintenance
54.0 Equipment, information or software is removed from a location without the knowledge or permission of the organization A.7.10 Storage media
55.0 Assets containing sensitive information are left unprotected whilst offsite A.7.9 Security of assets off-premises
56.0 Sensitive information can be read from storage media that has been disposed of or reused A.7.14 Secure disposal or re-use of equipment
57.0 Someone could access systems they are not authorised to using a device that has been left logged on A.8.1 User endpoint devices
58.0 Support staff, e.g. cleaners and security personnel, are able to read sensitive information left unattended on desks A.7.7 Clear desk and clear screen
59.0 Loss of data due to incorrect performance of operating procedures A.5.37 Documented operating procedures
60.0 Information security may become compromised when changes are made to the organization, business processes or information processing facilities and systems A.8.32 Change management
61.0 Systems run slowly or not at all because the resources required are not available A.8.6 Capacity management
62.0 A poorly-tested software change results in errors in a business-critical process A.8.31 Separation of development, test and production environments
63.0 An administrator of a cloud service makes a serious and unrecoverable error that affects service availability or security A.5.23 Information security for use of cloud services
64.0 Systems are affected by malware e.g. ransomware or spyware, having a serious effect on service delivery and security A.8.7 Protection against malware
65.0 Data is lost and cannot be recovered from backup A.8.13 Information backup
66.0 Suspicious events are not detected due to inadequate logs being kept A.8.15 Logging
67.0 Incriminating logs are wiped or altered by an attacker A.8.15 Logging
68.0 An insider with admin access views sensitive data A.8.15 Logging
69.0 The time sequence of an attack cannot be identified because each of the clocks involved tell a different time A.8.17 Clock synchronization
70.0 The organization can't tell if a cloud service has been compromised because no logs are kept A.5.23 Information security for use of cloud services
71.0 Software is installed on an operational system which causes an unwanted effect e.g. compatibility issues or the introduction of vulnerabilities A.8.19 Installation of software on operational systems
72.0 A hacker exploits an undetected vulnerability and steals information A.8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities
73.0 A user installs some software that introduces vulnerabilities to the organization and its network A.8.19 Installation of software on operational systems
74.0 Penetration tests disrupt a live system during peak service hours A.8.34 Protection of information systems during audit testing
75.0 An external threat actor is able to gain access to the network A.8.20 Networks security
76.0 The required security mechanisms, service levels and management requirements for network services are not agreed with the supplier and so are not provided A.8.21 Security of network services
77.0 An external threat actor is able to gain access to a less critical network, and then use this access to enter more business-critical networks A.8.22 Segregation of networks
78.0 A hacker is able to exploit the weaknesses in virtual networking to carry out an attack A.8.20 Networks security
79.0 Information in transit is intercepted and compromised A.5.14 Information transfer
80.0 Information in transit to and from third parties is intercepted and compromised A.5.14 Information transfer
81.0 Confidential emails are intercepted and used as the basis for an attack e.g. fraudulent bank transfer A.5.14 Information transfer
82.0 Confidential information is shared with others by a third party because it was not agreed that this is not allowed A.6.6 Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements
83.0 New or changed systems are open to attack in ways that could have been predicted A.5.8 Information security in project management
84.0 Information involved in application services is intercepted and modified in order to commit fraud A.8.26 Application security requirements
85.0 Application service transactions are used to mount an attack on the organization or its business partners A.8.26 Application security requirements
86.0 Software is written that has an unacceptable level of vulnerabilities A.8.25 Secure development life cycle
87.0 Changes are uncontrolled whilst in development leading to poor quality software and badly-defined releases A.8.32 Change management
88.0 Business critical applications are adversely affected when the underlying operating platform is changed A.8.32 Change management
89.0 Significant modifications to software packages introduce security vulnerabilities, functionality issues and support problems A.8.32 Change management
90.0 Systems are designed without adequate regard to, or knowledge of, information security A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles
91.0 Development environments are able to be accessed by unauthorised persons who could introduce code that makes future attacks easier A.8.31 Separation of development, test and production environments
92.0 Code developed by an outsourcing provider may contain security flaws that are not discovered by the organization A.8.30 Outsourced development
93.0 Security functionality doesn't work correctly in live software A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance
94.0 Newly-implemented systems don't work as intended A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance
95.0 Test data doesn't identify issues with the software being tested and is itself of value to an attacker (e.g. if copied from live data) A.8.33 Test information
96.0 An attacker gains access to the organization's network using logon credentials obtained from a supplier who has legitimate access A.5.19 Information security in supplier relationships
97.0 A supplier, who provides services to and has access to the organization's information, has inadequate security controls in place and suffers a breach involving the organization's data A.5.20 Addressing information security within supplier agreements
98.0 A supplier uses contractors who do not have adequate security controls in place A.5.21 Managing information security in the ICT supply chain
99.0 A supplier is not delivering the level of service that they should A.5.22 Monitoring, review and change management of supplier services
100.0 A supplier e.g. cloud service provider, makes a change that is not expected and which significantly affects the organization's business processes A.5.22 Monitoring, review and change management of supplier services
101.0 It is not clear who should do what when an information security incident occurs A.5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation
102.0 Management is not aware that an information security event has been detected A.6.8 Information security event reporting
103.0 Weaknesses in information security do not get addressed because they are not reported A.6.8 Information security event reporting
104.0 No decisions are taken about whether events should be escalated to incidents A.5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events
105.0 The response to information security incidents is inadequate and procedures are not used A.5.26 Response to information security incidents
106.0 Nothing is learned from incidents and no improvements are made A.5.27 Learning from information security incidents
107.0 No usable or admissible evidence is collected as a result of a lack of awareness of how this must be done. Because of this, nobody can be prosecuted A.5.28 Collection of evidence
108.0 It is not known what level of information security must be provided during a disruptive event A.5.29 Information security during disruption
109.0 Information security controls become ineffective when a disruptive event happens A.5.29 Information security during disruption
110.0 The intended information security controls don't work during a disruptive event because they have never been tested A.5.29 Information security during disruption
111.0 Information processing facilities fail due to a lack of sufficient redundancy A.8.14 Redundancy of information processing facilities
112.0 It is not known what legislative, regulatory and contractual requirements each information system must meet and, as a result, such requirements are not met A.5.31 Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements
113.0 The organization is subject to legal action as a result of breaching intellectual property rights and licensing requirements A.5.32 Intellectual property rights
114.0 Records that are required to be kept are lost, falsified or accessed, resulting in legal or contractual issues A.5.33 Protection of records
115.0 Laws requiring the protection of personally identifiable information are breached, resulting in prosecution and fines A.5.34 Privacy and protection of PII
116.0 Cryptography is used inappropriately, resulting in prosecution A.5.31 Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements
117.0 The implementation of information security is never independently checked and many controls do not work as intended A.5.35 Independent review of information security
118.0 Management does not check that policies and procedures are being followed and people stop using them over time A.5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security
119.0 As systems evolve, security controls become less effective and more vulnerable to attack A.5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

Sheet: Likelihood

Likelihood
This table should be used to decide upon the most appropriate likelihood for a particular threat.
LIKELIHOOD DESCRIPTION SUMMARY
1.0 Improbable Has never happened before and there is no reason to think it is any more likely now
2.0 Unlikely There is a possibility that it could happen, but it probably won't
3.0 Likely On balance, the risk is more likely to happen than not
4.0 Very Likely It would be a surprise if the risk did not occur either based on past frequency or current circumstances
5.0 Almost certain Either already happens regularly or there is some reason to believe it is virtually imminent

Sheet: Impact

Impact
This table should be used as guidance to help to decide upon the correct impact rating for a particular threat.
IMPACT LEVEL IMPACT AREAS
Impact rating General description Effect on customers Financial cost Health and Safety Damage to reputation Legal, Contractual and Organizational Compliance
1.0 Negligible No effect Very little or none Very small additional risk Negligible No implications
2.0 Slight Some local disturbance to normal business operations Some Within acceptable limits Slight Small risk of not meeting compliance
3.0 Moderate Can still deliver product/service with some difficulty Unwelcome but could be borne Elevated risk requiring immediate attention Moderate In definite danger of operating illegally
4.0 High Business is crippled in key areas Severe effect on income and/or profit Significant danger to life High Operating illegally in some areas
5.0 Very High Out of business; no service to customers Crippling; the organisation will go out of business Real or strong potential loss of life Very High Severe fines and possible imprisonment of staff

Sheet: Selection Tables

Selection Tables
ONE TO FIVE OPTIONS
Select… Select…
1.0 Accept
2.0 Avoid
3.0 Modify
4.0 Share
5.0
RISK TYPE TREATMENT ACTION STATUS
Select… Select…
C Not Started
I In Progress
A Completed
CI Rejected
CA
IA
CIA

Sheet: Pivot tables

Pivot Tables
Risk Type Table Risk Owner Table Treatment Option Table Risks: Pre and Post Treatment Treatment Cost Table
Count of Risk Level Column Labels Count of Risk Level Column Labels Row Labels Count of Risk Summary Risk level Pre-Treatment Post-Treatment Row Labels Sum of Treatment Cost
Row Labels Calculated Grand Total Row Labels Calculated Grand Total Select… Low 1 1 Calculated 0.0
Select… 20.0 20.0 (blank) 20.0 20.0 Grand Total Medium 0 0 Grand Total 0.0
Grand Total 20.0 20.0 Grand Total 20.0 20.0 High 0 0